The senior government officials and the legal system in Israel are not adversaries, but partners in the connection of treason and defrauding the public

Attached here is a legal proceeding, the fact of its existence, its content, its essence, and its decision were hidden from the public. He exposes the most serious criminal connection since the founding of the State of Israel – a connection to concealing the discovery of the Chariot method and the secret of the Bible and redemption from the public, and on the other hand a connection to my personal extermination as the revealer of the discovery of the harbinger of redemption.

Chapter 1 is here – the written appeal that I submitted on 11/24/22

Chapter 2 here – the judgment allegedly given by the President of the Supreme Court on January 1, 2003

Chapter 3 is here – the reasons for the invalidity of Peshad and the fact that it is solid evidence that establishes how the Jewish leaders – Prime Minister Netanyahu, Minister of Justice Levin, along with Supreme Court President Hayut, State Attorney Isman and Ombudsperson Miara Beharev – are active partners in the crime connection.

 

---

chapter One’

Before the Honorable Judge Esther Hayut

President of the Supreme Court

 

Aviv Ben Yakir Tel. 050846021

2/15 Zahorit Square Eilat 8824201, mobile 052-2707080, zeremor@gmaul.com

The appellant / detainee himself

– against –

1. State of Israel
2. Adv. Amit Isman, State Attorney
3. Attorney Gali Miara Beharav Legal Adviser to the Government

29 Salah-e-Din St. Jerusalem

the respondents

Appeal against the decision of Judge Mordechai (Moti) Levy dated 6-10-22 in a request to disqualify it, MAT 192-04-22 at the Eilat Court of Peace

Preliminary clarification:

1. Respondents 2 and 3 are personally attached as respondents in this proceeding insofar as the grounds of appeal and the evidence in the arrest case and in particular in the disqualification request establish a suspicion and/or possibility that together or individually they are acting in a conflict of interest and in extreme violation of training if not more serious towards the State of Israel the 1st respondent and towards the general public in Israel and around the world.

 

2. It is clear that in the center of my defense as an idle defendant and as a false arrestee there exist in chronological order and on the scale of public weight two circles of facts and circumstances intertwined with each other: a. From 1992 until today – an attack by a criminal network including ship robbery and all my property and rights with the help of dozens of idle proceedings by lawyers and judges with the help of their predecessors in the position of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in the past and possibly with their personal help today. B. From 2003 onwards and in light of a unique scientific discovery – ” The Chariot Method” – the aggravated criminal connection between the officer and the officer and was used to hide the discovery from the public, to thwart its implementation and to carry out actions directed and intended for the personal elimination of the appellant, Ham.

 

3. In the “dispute” between me and the respondents (actually this is a robbery attack, disruption of proceedings and the elimination of a person with the help of idle procedures) the respondents never had and today there is not a shred of factual response to my testimony and evidence. This case is unprecedented in its weight and implications regarding the State of Israel and its future, regarding the Hebrew people, regarding the human race and the world, with the 2nd respondent, Attorney Amit Isman, and the 3rd respondent, Attorney Gali Miara Beharev, each of them individually carrying a role in their personal identity and bearing personal responsibility in the affair and each of which he is separately liable in response to the serious claims.

 

4. In this process, including me alone, the appellant faithfully represents the interests of the 1st respondent state and the public, while the 2nd and 3rd respondents representing the “government” (in its alternating compositions) are currently acting against the interests of the state and the public, with the assistance of senior politicians and the legal system as a whole.

 

5. The State of Israel is first and foremost a democratic and public national entity that belongs to all of its citizens and is bound by loyalty to the citizens of the country, but today it operates as a criminal organization / a definite straw corporation under the “supervision” of the respondents 2 and 3 and the legal system in general, Jews who wear robes are united in an organization that is controlled and operated by a banker The world and its robbers (Rothschild and Co. families, the Vatican).

 

6. In the circumstances above and those below, it is especially appropriate that Ms. Ester Hayut, president of the Supreme Court, hear the appeal and not an alternate judge.

 

• Ms. Hayut has a unique experience and background (which is neither canceled nor coincidental) in theater and comedy, drama and farce. He started playing in skits for a military band and continued up the acting ladder in another band’s skits – “The Family” Aharon Barak / Supreme Court Justices / Rothschild.
• These skills are required and will help her to understand a main component of my legal position and the “discovery of the Chariot” – since this episode is part of a “play/script” pre-written in a master plan and staged and being representative of a “scripted” reality in general.
• Mrs. Hayut serves as the president of a system which I criticize and denounce as tainted with corruption and which requires thorough correction, she is not knowledgeable about the shortcomings of this system and therefore there is no competent and worthy judge to discuss the proceedings.

 

7. The circumstances of self-representation in this appeal :

 

• The employees and representatives of the respondents who assisted in the robbery of my property and the robbery of my basic rights put me naked and naked in the absence of everything and the lack of funds to hire and provide adequate and adequate private representation, without even looking for one.

 

• Disruption of the proceedings by the respondent, the subject of the appeal: at the last hearing, Judge Levy released the public defender and accepted his request to be released before he discussed my request to disqualify him as a judge who preceded it, in his action contrary to the procedure and contrary to my request in the hearing, which he omitted in its entirety and “cut” from the protocol of the hearing,

 

• In advance and before his release from the representation of the public defender, Adv.

 

• From 2-4-22 until this date, the 3rd respondent, attorney Gali Miara, has refrained from investigating and stopping the crime reported in my complaint to her, number 85136, including ordering an acquittal in the idle proceedings pending against me.

 

• From 10-3-22 until this date, the 2nd respondent, Attorney Amit Isman, the state attorney, refused to comply with my demand/request (sections 7a-7l of my complaint to him)  to inform the High Court of his consent to immediate acquittal in the traffic cases , and above all he refused Handle my complaint as a whole (and work with the defense regarding the representation of the failed / criminal).

 

8. Appendices to the appeal letter:

• The three disqualification requests from the Central Committee of the appeal letter, the last is Appendix A.1 , the second is Appendix A.2 , and the first is A.3 .
• Copy of my complaint dated 3-10-22 before the respondent 2, the state attorney against the judge and other parties from the CBA as Appendix B to the written appeal (attached as Appendix A to the first request, along with my complaint against Prof. Kaplan for disrupting the proceedings together with Judge Levy). Confirmation The 2nd respondent, the state attorney for receiving the complaint and passing it on for examination was attached as Appendix B   to the first disqualification request marked as Appendix A.3 to the written appeal.
• The decision of the arbitrator is the subject of this appeal and the minutes of the hearing are marked as Appendix C to the written appeal.

 

9. Grounds of appeal

 

• The judge dismissed the grounds for disqualification listed in the first disqualification request dated 12-10-22   Appendix A.3 . This was attached together with its annexes as Annex B to the third disqualification request dated 10-27-22 which was allegedly discussed by the beneficiary subject to the appeal.

 

• In the request for disqualification and its appendices, claims and evidence regarding his actions in the procedure in invalid, supplementary and overlapping ways were presented to the beneficiary subject to the appeal as follows: a. Extreme conflict of interest, b. With clear bias (towards respondents 2 and 3 and the senior members of the judicial system in which he is employed), c. By knowingly assisting the disruption of the procedure, d. In aid of knowing a wide and serious crime against the 1st respondent and the public and against me personally, d. In a situation where a well-founded criminal complaint that I filed against him is placed before respondents 2 and 3 and is under their review and responsibility.

 

• Below are S. 96 and 97 of the complaint which was submitted to respondent 2 on 10-3-22 and was attached together with its annexes as Annex A to the disqualification request:

 

1. 6. Today, in idle (traffic) cases, the representatives of the prosecution/state and the High Court work in coordination to intensify the crimes.
   7. In these proceedings, the crimes of disruption, sweeping denial of rights, torture, damage to my health and threat of physical elimination are committed: thirty years from the date of the ship robbery, my property and rights – the state of robbery, oppression and attack against me still continues. Five months have passed since my last arrest, I am still an idle accused and a false arrestee. (The fact that 8 identical frivolous charges were filed and dismissed after unnecessary discussions was “forgotten”). The prosecution and the High Court (and apparently even a lawyer from the public defender’s office) have no answer to my defense’s claims as a suspect and in one piece ignore my solid evidence – my affidavit appendices – without being able to contradict and/or challenge even one detail of my testimony. In these idle proceedings I was represented by the prosecution in a false and malicious mannerAmong other things, as “deadly dangerous” (in the reversal of the facts), as “delusional and afflicted with exaggerated delusional thoughts” and as a suspect requiring “forced medical hospitalization” (both false representations were allegedly supported by a baseless and patently unfounded medical examination produced by “Zoom”, the work of Prof. Kaplan a crook on duty who accepts a bribe), so I was presented as a “serial traffic offender” (the driving offense record and criminal records were tampered with when presented to the court and their correct content indicates the opposite), as someone whose license was not renewed due to his mental condition (lie. to the DM), as a violator An order that he did not show up for a medical examination (another lie), as a “drug treatment refuser” (another lie: such treatment was not offered to me, the supervising psychiatrist stated that it was not required and so he specifically stated before me and in the court of law). See how many lies and disruptions there are in one arrest case! Consistent presentation of lies by state representatives and their adoption as facts by the judge of the arrest case Mordechai/Moti Levy,I was placed under arrest that was converted into house arrest and in this way my work was maliciously disrupted and has been disrupted for five months, my physical and mental health and my personal well-being in general have also been maliciously disrupted. In addition to being a clear victim of robbery, obstruction of proceedings and torture and torture in general, a blanket denial of rights and a clear and ongoing threat to my life and peace, indeed today the criminal prosecution and the “Jewish” judge Mordechai Levi are threatening me with forced hospitalization for the purpose of injecting “medicines” – two distinct avenues of elimination…

11. What’s more: prior to the decision that is the subject of the appeal, in the Bar’s appeal of its decision on a reasoned request to change conditions (in light of the cancellation of the disqualification that is the subject of the charge and other reasons), the District Court of Bish ordered Motiv Levy to correct the necessary. To this day and two months after the decision of the District Court (And eight months from the false arrest!) May he refrain from correcting his decisions as ordered by the District Court – that is, canceling the house arrest and disqualifying me from obtaining a valid driver’s license until the end of the proceedings – these are two adjacent decisions which he gave from the beginning without any factual and/or logical reasoning. (The second given without being so requested by the prosecution).

 

12. After submitting the complaint to the 2nd respondent, the state attorney and attaching it to the disqualification request, the subject of the appeal forced me to submit this request three times before he discussed it “in its entirety”, leaving me under house arrest without any justification or logic.

 

13. The traffic procedures were disrupted from the beginning: three indictment cases pending against me allegedly for driving offenses while disqualified and/or without a valid driver’s license, and/or without valid car insurance, including the arrest case in the title – are clearly idle cases . The very act of submitting them and the manner in which they were administered while repeatedly disrupting the case establishes conscious assistance to the crime by the State Attorney from respondents 2 and 3 in this appeal.

At the end of the day, I will present only a few of the disruption moves and its products, all of which are documented in the arrest file that is the subject of the appeal:

• A (deliberate) flaw in the filing of the indictments: a series of previous charges that the respondents filed and managed against me regarding the same crimes (allegedly) and under the same circumstances as those currently being tried, ended in acquittal and/or cancellation of the indictment .
• From the date of my arrest and for seven months in the main case, I was prevented from presenting preliminary claims that justify an immediate acquittal. The proceedings were intentionally disrupted by the representatives of the prosecution and a rotating series of judges, with the help of a fictitious “mediation” procedure and numerous idle hearings. The public defender assisted in the disruption and prevented me from exercising my right (and my duty according to the law) to focus on my preliminary claims and evidence – about which the state has no Any answer ! – and thus to stop and finish with one stroke of the sword a. A definite idle procedure, b. A crime unprecedented in severity and weight from a public, national and global perspective. A theatrical and colossal Jewish farce, as the president understands.
• The attorney even helped the respondents’ representatives and Judge Levy Hamotav, the subject of the appeal, to produce and present an unfounded and patently false testimony from Prof. Kaplan, a foreign psychiatrist who interviewed me on “Zoom” without examining my work and the foundation of my defense. Judge Moti Levy used this trial as an excuse to leave me under house arrest and subject to a “medical order” which was not required from the beginning and is not required, according to the genius psychiatrist who continuously and regularly supervises my medical condition.

My complaint against the professor was attached as an appendix to the complaint to the 2nd respondent and to the disqualification request. The software speaks for itself.

 

14. Assessing the President’s duty to hear an appeal despite a possible prior conflict of interest on her part: The President of the Supreme Court is defined by law as the most senior jurist in the legal and law enforcement systems of the State of Israel and as the senior arbitrator in any substantial dispute and/or omission in the affairs of the State and the legality of its actions and the actions of its employees and all judges. This appeal presents an omission Exactly like this, here the gravity and consequences are without precedent.

 

• As detailed in these affidavits and in the complaint I submitted to respondents 2 and 3, the judges of the Supreme Court are main partners in the criminal connection through their “handling” in the past through negligence or malice in any procedure I submitted and/or was submitted on my behalf. From the beginning (from 1984 and no later than 1992) I was marked as a target in the entire system and in particular in the Supreme Court. My petitions to the High Court, all of which focused on extreme violations by civil servants against the law, my rights and the rights of the public, were rejected outright, were not submitted at all for the response of the respondents and did not receive a single A matter-of-fact answer. The supreme judges left the public exposed to robbery fraud, concealment of first-rate information and betrayal of the Hebrew people and the state by its elected leaders and with their assistance. They left me, David Mesfinati, of all my property and basic rights, a victim of the “crucifixion” connection and elimination of which they are accomplices.

A1. See the content of the petitions and decisions of the High Court of Justice 1195/97 and 1508/08 – is there an application of law in them? Reference to the dispute? Were the judgments duly signed and by whom?

A2. See ref. 1338/02 and ref. 2095/02 and the decisions of the president’s representative (acting) Aharon Barak

• It goes without saying that if the “Supreme Court Family” (created by Prof. Aharon Barak, its President (Dim.?)) acted in matters of law and justice and in particular according to the “fundamental laws” (also created by Prof. Barak), then all the criminal cases and the traffic cases filed Against me there would never have been “born” at all and hundreds of hearings in the Court of Appeals, thousands of hours of lawyers and judges would have been unnecessary and spared from an “extremely busy judicial system” …

 

• In this very way, a “cloaked organization” (judges and attorneys, civil servants and private individuals) operates as a method of defrauding and robbing the public, including the state coffers: the “overload” is created by flooding the system with idle procedures prohibited by law and this failure is committed and established with intent, malice, fraud and fraud : a. Congestion of idle procedures allows the members of the “legal industry” bakery / organization to collect / rob capital from the public under false pretenses and feed a corrupt system. That’s exactly how my property was robbed and divided between the robbers, the members of the organization and with them a “straw man” – my younger brother,  b. Idle proceedings allow a permanent way for owners of funds and legal counsel to obtain from judges a psad against a party who has been robbed, robbed and has little money. third. The “burden” enables the “smoothing” of offenses and crimes by lawyers and judges who are members of the organization and the covering up of crimes and omissions. It provides the perpetrators of the crime and the lay public with a “background sheet and excuse”, even mocked and wretched, for the existence of a criminal situation and the absence of law and justice.

 

• It is reasonable and possible that in his refusal to disqualify himself, Judge M. Levi (as a hidden tzaddik) replied “a hot potato like no other” returned to his cooks, judges of the Supreme Court in Israel and its president at this time. (On the other hand, it is possible that he too, like his predecessors, expects in his conduct to be promoted in a criminal organization…)

 

• In this appeal and in her decision in it, the Honorable President of the Supreme Court is required to address my request to respondents 2 and 3 and its reasons – to order the investigation of all attorneys and judges suspected of being involved in the crime, while making a preliminary promise (to each suspect) of a conditional pardon with the help of artificial intelligence programming adapted to this. (The list of names of the robe wearers and elected officials was attached as Appendix B to the complaint, Appendix A1 in the appeal letter).

Does n’t this demand and proposal of mine present a single, logical and necessary solution to the scandalous situation today in the justice system and the attorney’s office which has been at the center of public complaints and all its separate sectors for many years?

And isn’t it appropriate and right that your colleagues, Honorable President, also and in particular those who are retired, will be the first to join voluntarily in the required and committed operation to clean the stables?

• In examining the evidence – my main book/testimony “Harmonizer of Redemption”, the draft of the films “The Secret of the Bible and Redemption” and my affidavits before the respondents and in the arrest file – is there even one detail in my overall testimony, in my scientific findings and in my legal position in general, which can be contradicted and is a matter of controversy?
• According to the same evidence, was it even possible to attribute criminal intent to me in the first place? Or dangerous to the public?

 

• And on a personal note to the president: My dear Esti, we are the same age. We are not enemies. We grew up in the same transit camp country. It turns out that I was destined (and so my life was) to correct the earthly world and its injustices and to provide knowledge, justice, abundance and balm, through a. Scientific discovery , b. Mishpat Tzedek in Zion and b. Operation construction and general training for the next era.

 

• Given that we all experience a pre-written and staged reality, according to which one non-religious Jew is destined to discover the secret of the Holy Scriptures and establish as a fact that reality and facts are the product of a “script” – a master plan –

And he is the only one who has in his hand one key and one solution to all (most) of the physical, scientific and spiritual barriers of man together, and to all riddles, prophecies, commandments and miracles of the Bible as one piece,

And without any degree (and not Hadar) he teaches engineers, scientists and rabbis a new and groundbreaking Torah and insight in their separate fields of expertise – aviation, diving, space, energy, nature, robotics, AI, the Bible – and as a whole

And he alone explains and proves – by whom and how the deep sea was “torn”, how the sun “stopped” in Gibeon, what are the conceptual symbols of “the tree of life and the tree of knowledge”, the solution to the riddles that were marveled at and hidden from the wise man in King Solomon, and that the secret hidden in the symbol of the lamp The seven reeds – the symbol of the 1st respondent State of Israel and of every judge and every court in Zion – is a symbol – an allusion to the half-skeleton of a limb (one of many) in the “Chariot act”,

And he alone knows the construction method and is qualified to build a “Third Temple” (which is not a temple and a cult structure, but a “carriage act” replica of the building of the “Creator’s” tabernacle in the cloud above Mount Sinai and the first prototype for those who come after him!)

And the knowledge in his hand ends every conflict between members of different religions and beliefs, since it solves the secret of Judaism, the secret of Christianity, Islam and the secret of every religion on planet Earth,

And his name “Aviv” is burned in advance in every corner of reality known to all – in the Torah and the prophecies of redemption, in Hebrew and Israeli culture in general, in language and poetry, in the first Hebrew city in the new Zion and in residential sites in Israel

 

• Given all this (along with many other evidences) is there nothing wonderful from you why and how Aviv, as the harbinger of redemption appears simultaneously with a scientific-biblical revelation as a harbinger of redemption and solves everything as the “most crucified” sacrifice for the judges of Zion and as a denouncer and canceler of the judgments of injustice in Zion in general?

Is there anyone qualified and worthy of me to “trial justice in Zion” and to create a state of justice in Israel?

And later to build a “Mercabe-Creator-Masek-Hall” in the End Sea and bring it by flight to Jerusalem?

Is it possible and proper for me to establish in the world a perception of reality that sees and creates, justice and prosperity –

The way of reason, science, logic, old Torah and new Torah, love and compassion?

 

• What is not clear is that your appointments and your position as president – and your trial here – are also not accidental and they were written to allow you to “play in a movie” and judge the matter of one detainee that we are the representative of the whole – according to law and justice or with lies and injustice.

 

I will summarize:

 

15. In light of the facts and allegations in this appeal, it is right and just to order an acquittal immediately in all the pending traffic cases against me. Being exposed to the full sheet of facts and circumstances, the President of the Supreme Court is authorized by law and is required to stop and end an idle procedure that was presented and exposed to her.

 

Regarding my driving a car, the subject of the idling charges: I hereby inform the Honorable President of the Court and the 2nd and 3rd respondents that I intend immediately to drive a licensed, proper and insured vehicle. When the 2nd respondent, Attorney Isman, produces a valid driver’s license as requested – I will carry it in my pocket. If the 2nd respondent or the 3rd respondent consider this to be an offense and grounds for further charges – they will explicitly state so in response to this appeal and will separately justify their position.

 

16. It is also from law and justice that the Honorable President of the Supreme Court instructs respondents 2 and 3 to do according to the law and without delay what is required in my complaint and notice of 3-10-22 which is in their care (attached to the request for disqualification and this appeal) and accordingly to correct their omissions (and those subject to them) ) towards the state, towards the public in Israel and around the world and personally, the appellant.

 

17. Unfortunately, and alternatively, the Honorable President is requested to accept the appeal and order the transfer of the hearing to another party.

 

 

 

_____________________

Aviv my dear

Azir, “The Harbinger of Redemption”

 

Note: No affidavit was attached to the appeal letter. There is no doubt (or dispute) about the fact that it was written by me and myself and its content is supported by sworn testimony and protocols and they are before the court. If the Honorable President specifically requires it, I will attach a signed and certified affidavit by an attorney.

 

 

---

Chapter 2 – Passover 4

 

According to 8540/22

 

before:

Honorable President A. Hayut

 

The appellant:

Aviv my dear

 

N. G. D

 

The respondents:	1. The State of Israel
	2. State attorney
	3. The legal advisor to the government

 

An appeal against the decision of the Magistrate’s Court in Eilat in MAT 192-04-22 of November 6, 2022 which was given by the Honorable Judge M. Levy;  Request dated 19.12.2022 to correct a clerical error in the appeal

 

On behalf of the appellant:

himself

 

Judgment

 

Appeal against the decision of the Magistrate’s Court in Eilat (Judge M. Levy) dated November 6, 2022 in Mat 192-04-22, in which the appellant’s request to disqualify the beneficiary was rejected.

 

1. The matter of the proceedings is the subject of the present appeal, which was filed on April 1, 2022, at the request of the 1st respondent to arrest the appellant until the end of the proceedings following an indictment filed against him for several traffic offenses, including driving while disqualified. During the months of April-May 2022, the court approved a number of relaxations in the conditions of detention, but following a psychiatric opinion submitted in the process (hereinafter: the psychiatric opinion), the court ordered on May 2, 2022, the involuntary hospitalization of the appellant.

 

2. On August 3, 2022, the appellant submitted a request for a reconsideration of the conditions of his arrest and claimed, among other things, that following the acceptance of an appeal he submitted to the district court in Be’er Sheva, a ruling ordering the disqualification of his license was annulled – and that the violation allegedly led to the initiation of the current procedure. The 1st respondent, for her part, opposed the request for reconsideration and stated, among other things, that the appellant’s license expired “many years ago”. On August 8, 2022, the adjuster issued a decision with the following language: “For the reasons of the response, but mainly due to a pending appeal before the district court, as claimed, the request is denied.”

 

On August 10, 2022, the appellant submitted a request for clarification of this decision and emphasized, among other things, that the appeal he submitted has already been decided and is not pending. On August 14, 2022, the adjuster clarified that the appellant’s claims do not justify a change in his decision – and emphasized, among other things, that the ruling regarding the disqualification of the license was indeed canceled “but the procedure is still ongoing”. An appeal filed by the appellant against these decisions to the Be’er Sheva District Court was accepted on September 4, 2022 with the consent of the parties, and the proceedings were returned to the Court of First Instance in order to discuss the appellant’s claims on their merits (Amt (district of B.S.) 1311-09-22). Following this, the beneficiary ordered the receipt of an up-to-date opinion on the appellant’s case, and this was submitted on September 28, 2022.

 

3. On October 12, 2022, the appellant, not through his attorney, submitted a request to disqualify the beneficiary from adding and discussing the procedure. The appellant stated that he filed a complaint against the assignee to the state attorney and “additional correspondents”, and therefore the assignee is in a conflict of interest. The appellant further complained about the content of the psychiatric opinion, which – so it is claimed – the defendant “allegedly adopted and was probably a partner in ordering”. The appellant added that the defendant denied him legal rights and interrupted him when he tried to raise his arguments, and specifically complained about a decision given on May 12, 2022 in which his request to represent himself alongside his attorney was rejected.

 

4. The judge ordered that the request be discussed during a hearing set for October 23, 2022, but the appellant did not appear for the hearing. In view of this, the judge ordered the deletion of the request for relief in the conditions of detention and the request for disqualification, and clarified that the appellant can submit these requests again, but he will have to appear for the hearing. Later on October 23, 2022, the appellant submitted a “repeat request” to disqualify the beneficiary, in which he announced that he stood by the grounds of the original request and requested to hold a hearing on the request on the same day. However, the following day, the beneficiary issued a decision in which he stated that the appellant’s request was redundant “due to the time when I was exposed to this request”, and that to the extent that the appellant believes that his requests will stand, he must resubmit them.

 

5. In view of this, the appellant submitted another invalidity request on October 27, 2022, and emphasized that he stands by the allegations in the original request. A hearing on the request was held on November 6, 2022, and at the beginning of it, the 1st respondent announced her opposition to the disqualification of the beneficiary. Later, the appellant’s attorney (who represented him on behalf of the public defender’s office) asked to be released from representation, but the appellant claimed that there should be a discussion on the issue of disqualifications prior to the decision on the request for release from representation. Despite this, the judge ordered the release of the appellant’s attorney and the public defender from representing the appellant in the proceedings, after which the appellant asserted his claims regarding the disqualification request. Meanwhile, the appellant referred to the complaint he submitted and claimed that the beneficiary is in a conflict of interest and acts with “extreme bias”. It is also claimed, among other things, that the respondent “sees [the appellant] as an enemy, he treats [the appellant] as contemptible and more or less depersonalized, throughout the hearing”; that the beneficiary treats the appellant dismissively and prevents him from raising his claims; And that the probationer wants to imprison the appellant “under medical supervision and under injections”.

 

6. The beneficiary rejected the request to disqualify him on the website, stressing that there is no conflict of interest and that there is no bias in our case. The respondent also emphasized that he has no connection to the judge mentioned by the appellant, and expressed criticism regarding the claims and nicknames attributed by the appellant to that judge.

 

7. Hence the appeal before me, which was accepted into the registry on 12.12.2022 after the appellant’s request for an extension of the deadline for its submission was received (in ref. In the motion for disqualification three times, Balama “rejected” the claims made in the motion, and refrained from acting in accordance with the district court’s directive. The appellant also believes that there is reason to be flawed in that Motheb released his former attorney from representation prior to the hearing of the motion for disqualification. In addition, the appellant notes that he attached to his appeal the respondents 3-2 (the state attorney and the legal advisor to the government) because in it he makes various allegations regarding their conduct. The appellant lists in this context defects which, in his opinion, occurred in various procedures that were conducted or are being conducted in his case, and he requests a series of remedies including his acquittal in the pending traffic cases against him and the provision of various instructions For respondents 3-2.

 

8. I reviewed the appellant’s arguments and came to the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed. First, it should be noted that some of the claims in the disqualification request and in the appeal before me were raised without any factual foundation. Therefore, these claims cannot be relied upon in this format (see and compare: AA 22/12 Peloni v. Pelonit, paragraph 6 (18.1.2022); AA 7359/21 Pelonit v. Pelonit, paragraph 11 (11.23.2021)). Therefore, I did not find a flaw in the fact that the disqualification decision was also formulated in a general and concise manner. In any case, after reviewing the disqualification requests submitted in the procedure, the minutes of the hearing from November 6, 2022, and the decisions about which the appellant complained – I did not find that in our case there was proof of grounds for disqualifying the beneficiary in accordance with section 77a(a) of the Courts Law [combined version], 5544-1984 (below : Law of the Courts). The appellant’s objections to the manner in which the proceedings were conducted and to the deliberative decisions made within it are “appealable” claims, the proper place to raise them is not in invalidity proceedings but in appropriate appeal proceedings (ref. 8544/17 Levy v. the State of Israel, paragraph 7 (7.11 .2017)). The fact that the appellant filed a complaint in the beneficiary’s case does not establish grounds for disqualifying the beneficiary from discussing the proceedings (see and compare: Case 9135/20 Kahlon v. State of Israel, paragraph 8 (12.30.2020); Case 1624/22 Amr v. Lev, paragraph 7 (13.4.2022)). The other remedies listed by the appellant in his appeal have no place in invalidity proceedings according to section 77a of the Law of Courts, and therefore there is no reason to require them in the context of this appeal.

 

9. On the sidelines, I noticed that throughout the appeal, the appellant combined various and unnecessary statements directed at me, which I chose not to address.

 

10. For all the reasons listed above, the appeal is dismissed.

 

 

Given today, 8th of the Tevet of the Holy Week (January 1, 2023).

 

 

 

H. N. H. A. H

_________________________

22085400_V01.docx

Information Center, Tel. 077-2703333, *3852; Website,   https://supreme.court.gov.il

 

---

Chapter 3 – The reasons for the invalidity of the PASAD in appeal 8540-22 and being solid evidence that establishes how the Jewish leaders – Prime Minister Netanyahu, Minister of Justice Levin along with Supreme Court President Hayut, State Attorney Isman and Ombudsperson Miara Beharev – are active partners in the crime connection and in defrauding the public.

1. Peshad is not signed, a fact that in itself invalidates its validity.
2. Moreover, the Peshad and its obvious flaws (see below) raise a suspicion/concern that it was not the president who wrote it, but a hand that disappeared in the dark. In the dark reality in which the Supreme Court operates, such a phenomenon is already known and even documented.
3. The President of the High Court discussed the appeal without receiving the response of respondents 1, 2 and 3 as required and without the respondents being legally added as respondents in the proceedings.
4. By relieving the ombudsman and the state attorney of the obligation to submit a response – a preliminary obligation in the law and this is even justified in the appeal letter – President Hayut turned the procedure, contrary to law and justice, into a distinctly idle proceeding. The respondents who received the appeal letter along with the request for an extension and did not respond to it were omitted from the file) are aware of this omission and its consequences.
5. The PsaD completely distorted and completely eliminated the background to the appeal and the grounds for the appeal as presented by the appellant – since the judge Moti Levy, the subject of the appeal, is actually an accomplice and maliciously assists in the connection of a crime against the arrested appellant (ABI), since I have been for thirty years, including in the proceedings before him, a victim of an attack Robbery of a ship and property, usurpation of fundamental rights, to a series of idle criminal and civil proceedings and traffic and arrest cases. These idle proceedings without exception were sewn up and conducted against me by the 1st respondent the State and the 2nd and 3rd respondents the State Attorney and the Ombudsman and/or their predecessors in office, with the assistance of a circle Judges presided over these proceedings and in all of them, without exception, the charges were dropped after years of self-initiated and unnecessary judicial torture.
6. The PSAD deliberately ignored the duty of the respondents to respond to my claims above and in particular their duty to respond to my demand for protection and to order the investigation of the judges and attorneys involved in the connection to the crime and the disruption of the investigation and trial proceedings in the case of the connection to my assassination and my silence.
7. The PSAD completely ignored my arguments in the written appeal – claims that neither the President herself nor the respondents can contradict – according to which: a. The affair that was revealed to the benefactor who is the subject of the appeal and was presented and based on before the President in the written appeal is the heaviest and most serious in the laws of the State of Israel since its foundation, b. The procedure administered According to the beneficiary, the subject of the appeal is a clear idle procedure in addition to identical procedures that preceded it and all of them in retrospect ended in cancellation and/or acquittal.
8. Peshad mistakenly and/or misleadingly stated (see S. 8) that the appellant’s claims (which the president distorted and omitted their essence) “were not supported by a factual basis” and this when the evidence attached to the arrest file MAT 192-04-22 and presented in it include The rest are three detailed affidavits signed by me and appendices attached to them, which present all the evidence required to establish the facts and the claims of my defense, including past correspondence with respondents 2 and 3 and their predecessors in office and current correspondence with them during the management of the arrest case that is the subject of the appeal. Also, this evidence includes a draft for the films “The Secret of the Bible and Redemption” and the content of the website “The Chariot Discovery and the Chariot Project” .
9. So in the same section (8) the president stated absurdly and contrary to logic that “the appellant’s mistakes about the way the procedure was conducted and the judicial decisions given within it are “appealable” claims, the proper place to raise them is not in invalidity proceedings but in appropriate appeal proceedings” – thus ignoring the fact and the appellant’s arguments Because an “appropriate appeal procedure” was indeed filed in the district court and accepted – but the defendant who is the subject of the appeal ignored the decision of the district court in the appeal and avoided implementing it.
10. Peshad completely ignores the usurpation of my fundamental rights in the process that is the subject of the appeal and in it he even adds and cancels these rights himself – the right to equality before the law, the right to property, the right to freedom of movement, the right to a fair and transparent legal hearing, the right to receive adequate and legal representation and more. Peshad reveals The “fundamental laws” in general and in particular the “Human Dignity and Freedom Law” as a complete fiction – a fiction which the president of the Supreme Court in the past, Aharon Barak, and its current president, acted and act as a routine, detached from the program and contrary to its essence.
11. Pasa’d by President Hayut (or anyone who acted on her behalf or in secret) is characterized by “extreme unreasonableness” – a concept that the President and the High Court of Justice usually present as a reason to invalidate laws and procedures, when they themselves act according to it and rule as a matter of extreme unreasonableness.
12. Pasa’d was written and given by the president Hayut in a clear conflict of interest and ignoring it, as aiding in the commission of the crime of treason against the country, while the president committed the crimes of gross violation of training and obstruction of proceedings. These crimes and misdemeanors were and are at the center of the appeal and at the center of my defense claims as a defendant in a clearly idle case, when the respondents in the process – and also the president herself – currently have and never had an answer to these claims.
13. The Pashad was written at a unique time when the president and senior officials of a new administration are discussing – and publishing in public – an apparent “disagreement” between “the need for legislation and reforming the legal system” (claims of senior government officials and the majority of elected officials) and “the destruction of the democratic system and the legal system in Israel” (claims of members of the Habashi organization The cloak, headed by President Hayut and the respondents in the appeal of the Ombudsman and the State Attorney).
14. Why is this a misrepresentation and a fraud on the public? The claims of both sides are true but minimized and neither side presents a proper response to the situation to be approved: all the above systems – the Knesset, the government and the judicial system – are infected with extreme corruption and operate as usual while committing serious crimes. First and foremost among those crimes is the crime of treason against the state and the Jewish people by hiding the discovery of the Chariot from the public in Israel and the world and the attempt to eliminate me as a forerunner during my crucifixion for years. This is a crime that both sides in the “dispute” are complicit in.
15. First, this crime creates an annulment and betrayal of the principles of the Declaration of Independence – a declaration of the foundation of a state that will act in accordance with the spirit of Israel’s prophetic vision – since my discovery of the “Chariot Method / Chariot Act” presents one true answer and a single way of fulfilling that vision of “redemption” and the end of days. In addition (as shown and explained in detail in my affidavits in the arrest case, including before the fictitious “adversaries”) the continuation of the crime and its non-stopping will lead to the elimination of the only basis for the existence of the Jewish state, a situation that could lead to the destruction and destruction of the State of Israel.